Inner space translated in English, by thewordwatcher

Saturday, April 11, 2009

     Since childhood, I have been observing the world, nature, animals, stars and often asked me the questions: ‘Our world is really built as science tells us, we are absolutely alone in this enormous universe, and if so, why and for what such a punishment He met? ‘ These questions have often kept me awake at night, and the fact that no one could reasonably answer them was the one that killed me the most. So I went on the ‘road’, the road to the sources of truth. I have read many books and scientific papers that have made a bold attempt to explain the phenomenon of our existence, creation, and the structure of the
universe. Unfortunately, after reading many of them, I came to the conclusion that they all lead to a dead end, from which you have to turn back as soon as possible and start searching again. And that’s how many years passed to me, until…

     In contrast to the Copernican model of the universe, there is much evidence that we are living within the Earth’s galaxy. The theory of the inner cosmos has not existed for a short time, but it was widely known in ancient cultures and nations. There was the state of Sumer in the southern part of Mesopotamia and the Persian Gulf. To this day, it is not known when and from where its inhabitants came – an extraordinary, mysterious people who already had amazing knowledge about space, ahead of modern discoveries – unfortunately ignored by science for centuries, and taken only seriously after sending NASA probes into space in the 1970s that provided the first pictures of planets of the solar system in color – confirming 100% of sumers’ messages.

     Many theories have been laughed at and many will laugh at it. But one must finally say with full vigor that: `a few hundred years ago the present model of the universe was created in the minds of astronomers, and is based only on observations from Earth and mathematical calculations, which are only a mathematical model, ie they are relative and do not have to cover at all with reality! ‘. Einstein himself once said: ‘As long as reality is based on mathematics, one can not be sure that it is based on reality’. What does not mean anything but the fact that nature is unpredictable and as long as things are translated by mathematical formulas, definitions of phenomena can not be clearly defined. The mathematical model is only a model that can not be accepted as reality in any case! Unfortunately, many scientists approach this issue very superficially and irresponsibly. They receive some results in their research, and inaccuracies of their research are often unable to explain themselves and to authenticate them, they introduce so-called measurement error. In my humble opinion, this is not a measurement error, it is a conscious distortion of science and misleading people, and often for long, long years!

     The internal model of the universe is itself and in itself a great harmony of all processes occurring in nature, which do not need any mathematical models to be able to build and understand it. But the funniest thing is that our world is built in such a way that the laws of physics are equally valid in both cases, which, unfortunately, makes the Copernican mathematical model the basis of all the teachings about the construction of the universe, because it was ‘the first’. All the shortcomings and inaccuracies of the heliocentric model are cleverly covered with complementary theories, and the rest is simply silent.

     In the case of the inner cosmos, everything is inverted and closed in a sphere, where the proportions are correspondingly smaller (real), and in the second they go to the dimensions so unimaginable that these are measured in billions of light years. Long ago observed and confirmed by science the fact that the more we move away from the Earth the speed of spacecraft is decreasing, this science is not able to clearly explain this phenomenon. The speed of light in space so far no one could, or did not want to measure, what many things would eventually explain.

     The biggest mistake made by science is the belief that the speed of the electromagnetic wave in the vacuum and the resulting physical constant is c = 299792458 m / s. Going deep into the essence of the theory of relativity does not solve this issue, simply confuses the matter and moves away from the main subject.

     In order not to be misunderstood, I will add that today’s science does not reject this possibility.
The possible variability of the speed of light can have a considerable cosmological significance, it can be evidence of one or another topology of the Universe, with one or another direction of its development. It can also have a key philosophical significance.

     A Russian scientist has investigated that a laser beam pointing vertically into the sky loses much of its speed, and therefore behaves digressively. Why is it silent on this subject, why it is so hard to reach the results of many scientific works that would finally reveal this terrible mistake of astronomers for hundreds of years, which is actually an ordinary mathematical model, created in fallible human heads, completely absent from reality – and which has never been proven and proven in any way, since it is impossible to prove it at the moment.

     For me, the Universe is one huge organism that combines energy, not super- separated objects (separation is the main problem of science). The theory of relativity really complicates everything, assuming that the light is slowing down but the observer does not feel it would not be fun with time and space, and the bending of spacetime is interesting, provided that we know the complicated mathematics, which also does not explain anything. Many people say that theories of relativity can be confirmed with great accuracy, everyone agrees, except the Universe itself. Well, but on the basis of unchanging c, we have developed so many “wonderful” theories, such as the theory of relativity.

     But human nature is such that if a person attended school, did a high school diploma and then higher education, then from comfort and conformism he does not think about the fact that according to today’s laws of physics, which is proven, the top can not fly, and some years and not one! Many devices work, and according to the laws of physics should not work. Because these devices are created by people with passion and not by knowledge of physics or astronomy and adherence to imposed patterns. For example, if Nikola Tesla did not have these passions and had all the above mentioned negative human traits, probably to this day we would not know alternating current, motors and generators for this current, and many other ingenious, timeless inventions.

     In 1000 years, or maybe even earlier, someone will finally prove a long-known truth. Our descendants will look at our learning with pity, just as we do now with the study of the Middle Ages, and the study of the Middle Ages did so with ancient teachings. Or maybe soon the Americans will finally land on the moon and see how small it really is, which is clearly seen in satellite imagery, and that the earth is indeed a sphere, but we are in it! Other planets are also empty inside, and it is possible that their lives contain life and even other civilizations. This would also explain why so far no life forms have been found on other planets. You simply have to look for life in the middle of planets, not outside. As a curiosity I will give you a fact researched by NASA, that the moon is empty inside like an egg shell. It is not inconceivable that the Earth is also part of another galaxy and circulates inside it and its external surface is barren and covered with huge craters, like all other planets that have been ‘explored’ so far. This is probably all built up: the earth and its nucleus circulate in the middle of another planet, this planet again in the middle of another and so into infinity.
What we perceive as stars is the center (core of the galaxy) of our earth system, which we take (mistakenly) for the starry sky. All in all, we can see through the center some light, and maybe even only sunlight, which is piercing through it, bounces.

     Famous people like Isaac Newton and Leonhard Euler preferred the theories of empty earth all their lives. Measurements made more than 100 years ago completely confirm this theory, but science does not accept these facts, and even does not allow such a thought to itself. And enough to build a powerful telescope with infrared filters to be able to see from Poland, for example, London or Moscow, and standing on the ground, not on top of the highest tower or mountain! But this fact would certainly be just another challenge for scientists who at all costs tried to prove that this is another phenomenon caused by a reflection of the atmosphere to defend their religion called science and its commandments.

     Well, how will science explain, for example, the phenomenon with planes? Why, when they fly at a height of 7 km, from this height visibility from the aircraft should not exceed 296 km, and tests using infrared cameras, showed that the visibility is 532.9 km, although the angle of view from this height it absolutely prevents you from seeing such a large tract of land! The angle of view from this height is almost twice as large as what mathematical calculations show us and says logic. I do not think anyone will say that during the measurements it is the ‘Fata Morgana’ that represents 237 km of land !? Everyone who once played in the calculation of the sphere, and dealt with a bit of optics, can easily calculate it. And this fact is one of the proofs that we live in the middle of the globe, because this visibility is from this height, but only in the middle of the sphere. 

     The mere translation of the Fata-Morgana phenomenon should give many people a reason to think about its meaning and logic. And it seems that once she shows upside down, but only at small distances, and the latter again realistically and often in lengths up to several hundred kilometers, often lasting a dozen or so hours. Some observations indicate that in Strasbourg the port of Constantinople (Istanbul) was seen with such an amazing precision of detail as if it were a mirror image of a neighbor’s house. How can it be possible that from such a distance of up to 1,866 km, the phenomenon of Fata Morgana takes place, where science tells us that if light falls on an opaque plane, its part is absorbed. The ratio of the reflected stream to the incident stream is called the reflection coefficient. If any surface, at which 100 lm drops, 70 lm is reflected, the reflection coefficient is 0.7 or expressed as a percentage of 70 percent. The remaining 0.3 or 30 percent. it was absorbed. Something here too many of these phenomena undermining the basic laws of optics and other sciences!

     Many of you have certainly already been at the sea, in the harbor, and watched the coming ships. Obvious observers certainly did not escape the fact that we see the approaching ships as if the chimneys first emerged from the depths, which would prove the convexity of the Earth and the heliocentric model of the universe. Nothing but the optical illusion, caused by the reflection and refraction of the elliptic light towards the core of the Earth.

     In 1897 in the USA, Professor Morrow and Dr. Teed built constructions that aimed to measure the concavity, the bulge of the ocean. So what do you think, what were the measurement results? Here they are: At the length of `only ‘3.8 km the ocean was 1.22 m above the reference point! So the ocean is concave like a bowl of poppy-heads! It is also proved that the light collapses elliptically upwards, resulting in the illusion of a convex earth. When the distance to the ship is large enough, we get the impression that he emerges from the sea and does not come from above, because with the elliptical light the visibility of our eyes is limited to seeing only the upper parts of the ships, where the lower ones are out of
sight. This phenomenon can be calculated using the formula for refraction of
light, taking into account the internal concavity of the sphere at a given distance from the reference point. Calculations and appropriate measurements prove this fact! Did any of you ever wonder if, when standing on the seashore, we are referring to the ‘impression’ of the sea that is much, much higher than the shoreline? If not, I recommend paying special attention to it – which can also be observed on land.

It gives a refraction pattern that helps in proving this theory: b1 = arc (half circle) = 5000m
b2 = circle = 10000m
r = radius of the globe = 6371000m

dh = height difference which the theodolite (geodetic instrument) should indicate when the stream of light is (supposedly) absolutely simple.
X1 = (r / cos (b1 / r)) – r
X2 = (r / cos (b2 / r)) – r

dh = X2-X1

X1 = (6371000 / cos (5000/6371000)) – 6371000 = 1,962016 m X2 = (6371000 / cos (10000/6371000)) – 6371000 = 7.848070 m dh = 7.848070 – 1.962016
dh = 5.886054 m

     As you can see, the stream of light breaks up elliptically! Who still does not believe, let him base the larger numbers for b1 and b2, or borrow from his friends the geodetic instrument with mechanical level regulation (only such are suitable), and he will convince me of my reason. Measurements can be carried out even in a closed room!

     Whom is not convinced by all this evidence, I recommend this trip to Lake Constance and taking with me a telephoto lens with a focal length of at least 400 mm, and taking a few photos of the opposite shore, between Friedrichshafen and Romanshorn. For this purpose, it is advisable to set the lens horizontally and take a few photos, while in the middle of the lake a ferry passes. As a reminder, the distance between them in a straight line is about 11 km. According to Copernicus’ theory and a straight line of light rays, a photo taken in such a way should present a ferry in the middle of the lake, and on the other side we should see the tops of trees and higher storeys of buildings. I assure you that it is not! The picture will always be taken and each time we will present a ferry in the middle of the lake, and in the middle of the ferry, above the side, we will see the other shore! Appropriate measurements of the shuttle showed a height difference of up to 2.34 m between the surface of the lake and the point seen in the pictures as the shore! Providing such photos to certain institutions caused the scientists to be amazed and scratching their heads, up to the blood, as well as making the appropriate calculations. Here they are:

Half of the distance between Friedrichshafen and Romanshorn: b = 0.5 * 11 km = 5.5 km.
average radius of the Earth: r = 6371 km Search
altitude: h

h = (r – (r * cos (b / r))) * 1000
h = (6371 km – (6371 km * cos (5.5 km / 6371 km) )) * 1000 h = 2.374 m !!!!

     These are not any fairy tales for naughty children, it is not making people water from the brain, but the truest truth, because this is the height of our beloved Earth on the arch and at this distance. This is clear evidence of the concavity of the Earth, which scientists ignore, and those who are convinced of its rightfulness, hold the smileys with a padlock, probably in fear of ridiculing themselves against the whole scientific community, and the fear of losing so hard-earned
authority. Who is behind all those who have an interest in lying to humanity? After all, every layman could do such simple measurements and calculations to find out the truth and open the eyes to all doubters.

How long does this farce last, and why?

     In 1901, in the ‘Tamarackmine’ mine, two engineers took measurements of the distance between the mine shafts on the surface and underground, at a depth of 1229.4 meters, with the help of risers down to this depth. The distance between the panes under the ground was 975.360 m, and on the surface 974.964 m. Because both of them did not know the internal cosmic theory, convinced of the erroneousness of their measurements, they repeated it repeatedly, but under the supervision of Professor Mc. Nair, who as a great supporter of the Copernican theory had to with a heavy heart and unconditionally recognize these results as real! Similar measurements were also made in other mines and on the highest bridges in the world. These measurements were carried out 100 years ago and are repeated to this day. Each time the result is the same, the Earth is concave and not convex! And what about science? Well, everyone knows. I still remember from school how we were pressed in, that the distances between the panes below ground are always smaller than those on the surface, because our planet is a sphere and we live on its surface. Measurements show but quite another. Who, then, who makes water from the brain and for what purpose?

     Everyone has certainly heard about the speed measurements of ships using the so-called logo, which originally had the form of a scaled rope wound up on a turnstile with a wooden block attached to its end. The measurement was done by throwing the block or stern of the block and measuring the speed at which the rope developed. The speed was traditionally measured at the nodes.

     Similarly, you can act when measuring the speed of the Earth, but not with the object thrown overboard, but by throwing `the light behind her ‘. It was thought that if the Earth revolves around the Sun, its speed can be measured using special instruments. For this purpose, the Nobel Prize winner Professor Allais made a very precise optical measuring device that was to indicate the speed of the globe with respect to the Sun. The measured speed was 0 km / h! The same applies to the rotation of the Earth around its own axis. Professor Barnet investigated that a metal bar set in a rotary motion becomes magnetic, and so he came to the conclusion that the Earth, which is packed with various metal particles, rotating around its axis at a speed of 1670 km / h, would create such a huge magnetic field, that she should stop after a short time.

     The laws of gravitation in the mathematical model of Copernicus also can not be explained logically, only some false assumptions are made, not supported by any sensible scientific facts or evidence, because this phenomenon can not be logically explained, but according to the Copernicus theory. internal galaxies theory for sure. Some say that Earth is attracting us, while others say that it is some unknown force from the cosmos that pushes us to the Earth. Same supposition, no evidence! As the distance to the Sun increases, the force of gravity does not decrease. Note that in further orbits from the sun there are different sized planets and the Sun holds them, not on the basis of universal gravitation, but on the principle of segregation according to the potential, because the larger planets are supposedly again small planets.

     In the internal system of the galaxy, the main source of gravity is its nucleus, not the Sun. The center of the galaxy revolves around its own axis, as well as the Sun and the planets around the center of the galaxy – among other things, that’s why we have day and night. It is possible that the Earth revolves around its own axis, but at a speed close to its core, but certainly not with such a crazy speed that science conveys to us. Well, but scientists have to explain to us 24 hours an hour, because as we know the circumference of the Earth on the equator is about 40 thousand km and when we divide it for 24 hours, we will get a speed of about 1667 km / h. So let someone explain to me sensibly what in this case is happening with the centrifugal force? It disappears, it is not simply because physics has come up so that it balances! What strength would have to attract the hill at such a speed. Press us to the Earth so that such huge forces will balance? I will not mention the unimaginable overloads.

     As of today, there are alternative theories of pressing by gravitational forces from space, which for thousands of years have been the basis of the theory of the inner galaxy, proclaimed eg by the Sumerians and many other ancient civilizations. The fact that ancient civilizations possessed amazing astronomical knowledge does not necessarily have to remind and prove to anyone.

     According to Helmholtz, the energy of strength can neither be produced nor can it be destroyed. Energy and power can only be transformed from one form to another. For example, you can convert potential energy into kinetic or thermal energy, which is much more complicated than it would seem. In other words, we recognize the strength after the body under this force begins to change its speed (because acceleration is a measure of speed change). The greater the force, the faster the speed changes. For example, a large force in a short time disperses a heavy object to high speed. A great force can also stop a great speeding object faster.

     In the Copernican model of the universe a certain inaccuracy immediately arises, and it is a force called gravity. For as we know, the phenomenon of gravity is the binder of the Universe – it is the basic force acting between large bodies – especially celestial bodies. It is a universal force, present in any corner of the cosmos. The value of the gravitational pull force acting between two bodies is directly proportional to the product of the masses of interacting bodies and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. Only that this force must constantly do some work, and without any external influence, which interferes with Helmholtz’s rule at every point. Already Isaac Newton knew this inconsistency, which he could not explain himself. He expressed himself in this way that it was a Divine Breath, who set all planets in motion. In schools, this is not clearly stated, only that this force is simply, it is always constant, it does not change and no one knows where it comes from, I will not mention the invention of gravitons – and here is one big discrepancy .

     Certainly many of you will ask: ‘Well, why are the Earth and the satellite imagery clearly seen as a round ball and not as a concave shell?’ good question. Now, please take into account the fact that the rays of light collapse elliptically upwards and run towards the center (core of the Earth), where they concentrate and vice versa – that is, the image that sees the lens from above is actually a reduced image of the Earth due to concentration the rays of light in the elliptical their course inside it – which would mean that the more we move away from it, the smaller we receive it, and looking from Earth to the sky, the nucleus of Earth as the sky in great magnification. Who once was in the planetarium, for sure knows what I am talking about and how it can function more or less.

     The very belief that the entire universe was created as a result of the ‘Big Bang’, and then life on our planet as a result of evolution – that’s how the bum did and everything arose – but of course only on Earth and God’s weapon nowhere else, is so great nonsense, I do not have enough words to say its magnitude. For everything that we do not have an explanation for, science will come up with some nonsense, support it with wise patterns, which they often work for years, and then they will permanently enter it into the ‘Bible Bible’, in order to gain fame, publicity, I will not mention financial benefits. And it is these same people who, undoubtedly, possess vast knowledge, use it so cleverly and effectively that they would be able to prove to everyone, everywhere and always, that the triangle is a circle and the sphere is a cube.

     Many of you have probably already heard about the drifting of continents, and that they fit together as if in the past they were all one big land, and from all possible sides. A professor (unfortunately I do not remember his name) wondered about this fact and came up with the idea of making an ‘inflatable globe’ with glued continents. The effect of the experiment was such that when there was enough air in it, all the continents, from all sides, formed one large land, and after inflating it, they departed proportionally at distances as we now measure between continents. Would not it explain the fact that our Earth is growing? For centuries, science did not even want to hear about it, and today it is accepted more and more boldly for the generally applicable norm.
It is a fact that the Moon moves away about 4 cm from Earth every year. Has it ever occurred to anyone that the Earth is growing and that is why the Moon inside the Earth is moving away from it?

     I have read with great interest many arguments about the growing Earth, where it is presented as a huge, living organism, and that it is built like any living cell. This would explain clearly and logically the fact that the continents are continually moving away from each other, the emergence of life on Earth, and that we live within the Earth, living with her in ‘SYMBIOZA’. Do we not know a similar model from such a disliked object in schools that we call biology?

     The issue of the size of the cosmos and intergalactic distances calculated in billions of light years: With the altitude (distance from the earth’s surface) the distances and probably all external dimensions of all bodies decrease, so that approaching the center of this our “universe” the space ship to which we fly it will be smaller and the distance it will travel in a unit of time flying at the same speed, also. It resembles quite a peculiar version of Theory of Relativity, where as it is known, it is not possible to achieve the speed of light, because as you approach this speed, all dimensions of the moving body and its distance to other bodies decrease so that it is not able to reach the speed light. In addition, the passage of time for this body also changes. From a mathematical point of view, it will probably be a sequence converging to the border (in particular to zero) where one meter on the surface of the Earth remains one meter, but the same real one meter near the center of the Earth we can already observe as a billion light years. Which means that the closer to the core of the galaxy, the velocity decreases accordingly, and at the core itself is equal to zero – which is caused by the huge gravitational repulsion of the nucleus. For this reason, getting to the core of the galaxy becomes absolutely impossible! However, the surface of our Earth is almost immobile relative to the core of the Earth, where the Earth’s crust has no gravitational force – but more on that later. The entire mystery of the internal space model is based on the concept of space transformation. All points outside the Earth, let’s move to its center, where all sizes decrease accordingly, and in the center of the Earth form its nucleus. In the same way, all possible laws of physics are transformed into the interior of the Earth’s galaxy. And so the unreal universe and the unimaginable distances and spaces created with the help of mathematics and astronomy, transform into the real world of the inner galaxy, only by adding a tiny, innocent minus against the result of mathematical action, which was inadvertently not set up a few hundred years ago.

     The question of the inability to see the other side of the Earth, the concave sphericity of the Earth, sunsets, day and night: All this explains the postulate of some parabolic curvature of light always towards the center of the Earth (up). This means that the Sun, moving at a certain distance from the Earth’s surface, around the center of the Earth, should always be visible (though at various angles) and it should never be at night. This is not the case, however, because at noon, when it is right above our head, everything is normal, then in the morning and in the evening the sun can be seen much lower than it should be at the ground, because the light from it does not fly to us straight line, only turns up. This means that then the light that came out of the Sun in our direction is no longer able to reach us, because it turned into space above us. However, the light that reaches us, came out from the Sun towards the area of the earth much further from us, and closer to the Sun, but turned over the ground so that it reaches us horizontally, which makes us see the Sun at the horizon. This horizontal light also runs into outer space and then we stop to see the sun, because the light that was reaching us horizontally was probably for the obvious reasons, the last one we could see.

     The seasons arise because the sun and the planets do not move on a fixed orbit, but on spiral or up and down orbits. It is also possible that it is not the sun, but the axis of the Earth relative to the core of the galaxy that changes its position, but rather it is impossible.

     Before you start making fun of this theory, I recommend making a small experiment with a permanent magnet and a lighter, which science knows perfectly but deliberately does not want to answer uncomfortable questions that could have so harmoniously built a mathematical Copernicus model to knock down ruins. Here he is: We hang a magnet on the wire and heat it with a lighter for a few minutes. As we know from experiments in physics lessons, that due to temperature the magnet will completely lose its magnetic properties over time. According to scientific research, the Earth’s magnetic field occurs naturally around the Earth and corresponds approximately to the magnetic dipole field with one magnetic pole near the geographic North Pole and with the other magnetic pole near the South Pole. The line connecting the magnetic poles forms with the axis of the Earth’s rotation an angle of 11.3 degrees. The magnetic field stretches several dozen thousand kilometers from the Earth, and the area in which it occurs is called the Earth’s magnetosphere. Geographers and physicists teach us that there is magma in the Earth’s core, and it escapes volcanoes in the form of liquid lava. The temperature of the lava reaches 1350-1400 degrees Celsius, and its solidification occurs at temperatures of 600-800 degrees Celsius. Now, please answer for yourself a simple question: ‘How is it that in the middle of the earth such high temperatures prevail, and the Earth does not lose its magnetic field, despite the fact that the experiment with a magnet and lighter apparently proves the loss of magnetic properties under the influence of heat? ‘. I’ve heard that science is beginning to change the concept of Earth’s magnetism, and says that the Earth is one great dynamism that is constantly in a rotational motion, where its nucleus rotates but in the opposite direction, creates its magnetic field. Hmmm – as it will be, we will soon find out that we humans are really only biorobots, created by UFOnauts, and our brains are ultra-modern 256-bit biological microchips with ultra-fast memory with a capacity exceeding 5 Yobibyte, which I already had read from Science Fiction publication.

     As many of you already know, the Sun is a giant ball of ionized gas, and the temperature of the Sun rises with depth reaching a dozen or so million degrees at the center, at which temperature fusion reactions can occur, but few know that the sun also has enormous magnetic field, which under the influence of such great temperatures does not lose, and should according to the laws of physics commonly known to us. Is it for sure that the sun is built, as science tells us? Or maybe the theory of the inner cosmos is much more reliable than expected?

A much more puzzling is the so-called refraction, reflection, absorption and polarization of radio waves in the ionosphere, which, as we know, ordinary radio waves quite effectively stops. If, however, such a wave would get through some miracle through it, it should disperse somewhere in space, but it is not! If, however, it has already passed somehow through the ionosphere, bounced off something in a vacuum, on the way back it should rebound from it and fly back into space and not to Earth. Radio waves always return to Earth at various time intervals (average 8 / 10sec) as so-called radio echoes. The fact of their existence was proven many times by Professor Stoemer in 1927, which was reported by the scientific world, which, after appropriate experiments, confirmed it 100%. Even suspected, that in our solar system for 12.5 thousand years there are two huge artificial satellites, which were a remnant of extinct highly developed civilizations of Earth, and these were supposed to reflect these waves. But it is not my goal to write a science fiction novel

A few unknown facts to know:

     Whoever closely followed the expeditions of space probes to Mars certainly remembers that Mars was repeatedly circumnavigated by them, but absolutely no measurements of its size were made, which would eventually explain many inaccuracies. Why does it look like a lot of billions, but it will not come to anyone’s mind when it comes to accurate Mars measurements? For the relevant queries sent to NASA, it was answered that the dimensions of Mars are already widely known and there is no need for this. After all, this is an irresponsible and unforgivable mistake!
Mars’ photos taken by NASA probes showed a lot of inaccuracies about the proportions of Mars to the Sun.
In addition, the Moon’s study showed that the mountains on the moon, supposedly supposed to have a height of up to 2,000 m, are actually small copies of lunar dust and meteorites! Similarly with the craters on the moon, the proportions are absolutely disagreement – nothing at all! Why, then, will NASA not finally make measurements of the size of the Moon and Mars?
From a 24-hour satellite film made in the 1960s by NASA, it appeared that the movement of planets would be the opposite of the one that we receive from Earth, and the Sun was moving through some strange orbit. The film was accelerated a few years ago on German television. None of the scientists could clearly explain the causes of these anomalous phenomena. And one more thing! During the total lunar eclipse through the lands, the NASA satellite took shots that clearly showed that the moon is brightly lit! How is it? The Earth completely covered the sun! So where did the light, the UFO illuminate the moon?

     I realize that after what I have already said and say further – modern luminaries of science will call me ignorant, dilettante and even charlatan. But despite this, I will continue in my conviction based on long-term observations of great scientists, analysis of their work and intuition, and that modern science consciously falsifies reality so effectively that even I have believed in all these nonsense for many years! Fortunately, there is a large group of professors, astrophysicists and many other highly educated and enlightened people who are constantly looking for the truth and will one day reveal it.

     I know that thunders from the blue sky will soon be thrown at me, that’s why I am asking critics / commenters about the use of constructive arguments, and an objective look at this theory, not a sense of insulting me only because I am saying a theory incompatible with that which you teachers gave the schools. Taking the position that it must be so and the end, because everyone says so, and who else thinks it in the head and the general laughter in the room, is only a proof of conformism and inability to think. I do not force anyone to believe in this theory, which can not be said about modern science, and attempts to convey my experiences to others are purely informative. I note that the material collected by me and the information contained in it should not serve as official science, and as a generally accepted model of the universe, but give the reader the opportunity to look at some of the “truths” that have been taught to us since childhood. Many will say: it’s fantasy. For now, I wrote only about the facts … fantasy, in the face of what else we discover, it can miss all of us. In order for this theory to be understood, one has to reject many schemes for centuries imposed upon us. There are a lot of unexplained things, but we must not forget that the world was pushed forward not by those who went on the schemas, but also by the very bold theses (Newton, Einstein) who were often considered charlatans, fools and dreamers. In order for this theory to be understood, one has to reject many schemes for centuries imposed upon us. There are a lot of unexplained things, but we must not forget that the world was pushed forward not by those who went on the schemas, but also by the very bold theses (Newton, Einstein) who were often considered charlatans, fools and dreamers. In order for this theory to be understood, one has to reject many schemes for centuries imposed upon us. There are a lot of unexplained things, but we must not forget that the world was pushed forward not by those who went on the schemas, but also by the very bold theses (Newton, Einstein) who were often considered charlatans, fools and dreamers.

     In conclusion, I would like to thank you for your attention and announce that all the models of the Universe known to us so far are of indefinite and purely subjective nature and their definitions are as uncertain as any science created by such imperfect human minds. Therefore, all scientific models should be perceived not as a reality in itself, but as models that can be helpful in perceiving it.

    As a curiosity, I would like to say that theories include, among others, Germany, Rolf Kepler, descendant of the famous Johannes Kepler, and the theory is based partly on his work, as well as the work of great science authorities, and on my own experiences and observations.

Summary …
So we have two theories. We are inside the earth and the fallen angels are inside or we are outside the earth and Agharta is inhabited by fallen angels and demons. Be able also by the nefilim.

What is shocking – we can not completely reject OBU theory, because in both there is some evidence that confirms both theories.

Rocking inputs can exits outside the Earth. This is not ruled out.

NASA gives us the biggest problem because the Vatican like NASA probably knows exactly what it is like, but it’s hidden from us.,29/ksiezyc-swieci-wlasnym-swiatlem,1520.html

Sun’rise’ & ‘set’- the Illusion that defines the Boundaries of our World (part 2)

IMG_0738“What is above knows what is below, but what is below does not know what is above. One climbs, one sees. One descends, one sees no longer”      -Rene Daumal 


While making a video, I used the red lines in the screenshot above/left to display the perspective of the perceived sun on the horizon, and how the source seems to be radiating from above, and reflected off multiple hidden horizons behind our range of experience. But what I wasn’t expecting, is to recognize its significance to esoteric symbolism. As most are aware, symbolism always consists of two or more meanings. The perspective I wish to point out tends to remain obscured within most so-called ‘truth communities’, but could be the most critical concept needed for an awareness to reality in this world. Part 1; Sun’rise’ & ‘set’- The Illusion that defines the Boundaries of our World covered the observable evidence’s in relation to our perceived horizon and apparent sun’rise’ and ‘set’ as an optical illusion, and likely being reflected off earth itself. This entry will focus directly on the symbolism that seems to lead in the same exact direction…

Here’s the link to the brief video on this topic

columbia torch lady
Standing atop a pyramid and holding a torch (Sun?), she wears a veil to conceal her body (earth?).


Screenshot_2017-07-14-18-33-03 copy
Here she can be seen stripped of her veil, fully naked, standing atop ‘earth’, above the ‘path to enlightenment’. Note the peacock within the cave.


1678 copy
The top half of this illustration shows the sun reflecting of mirrors (mirages?) of an arch (earth), and casting an image onto a screen (horizon, range of perception, atmosphere/luminiferous ether?).

1678 copy 2
The table may be flat, but the light is only directed into the vase

Here we see Nut, the sky goddess (luminiferous ether/atmosphere?) reflecting the Sun’s light into a bowl (earth?). We also see the sun reflecting onto a cave (earth?), and again off a mirror (mirage?) within this cave. Also notice the two peacocks (Dielectric fields?).



The Peacock

Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 12.36.21 PMScreen Shot 2018-04-21 at 12.38.48 PM

I’ve personally come to suspect a dielectric field with double vortices, resulting in a heart-shaped realm. This could explain the two peacocks, but it would only be wise to refrain from concluding something so far beyond our capacity to prove. I would recommend anyone interested in light and magnetism to read Ken Wheelers books and observe his many examples.

The evidence of this ‘dielectric field‘ may be more observable than we originally thought. It may consequently result in our blue skies that never exceed the troposphere. 


The Winged Sun


Before and after sun’set’, we can see that the light moves up and out, into another dimension above the shadow of earth (belt of Venus), and beyond our sensory perception. I call this shadow the solar horizon.

The video displays a more suitable example of the horizon’s apparent sun’set’ in relation to the symbolic winged sun. I can’t help but always refer back to an old quote of Plato’s;

“We do not experience reality in the so-called ‘real world’, but only its dim shadow

-PlatoIMG_06714c3a9fe6d5d45c67f9b20c43ab9d6f0c copy



Solar symbolism is all around us






Proposed ‘Space Colonies’; always Concave- Why?


I decide to begin this entry out slightly off topic with a science fiction concept known as Ringworld. First published in 1970 by author, Larry Niven, Ringworld became an instant classic of science fiction, winning the Nebula Award in 1970, as well as both the Hugo Award and Locus Award in 1971, and was followed by three sequels (The Ringworld Engineers, The Ringworld Throne, and Ringworld’s Children) as well as several prequel novels, co-written with Edward M. Lerner (Fleet of Worlds, Juggler of Worlds, and Destroyer of Worlds). Such highly publicized and recognized literature would surely grasp the attention of Hollywood producers, right?… Wrong… Now over 45 years later, we have yet to see a movie related to Larry Niven’s Ringworld. There is said to have been many aborted attempts to adapt the novel to the screen.

  • In 2001, Larry Niven reported that a movie deal had been signed and was in the early planning stages.
  • In 2004, the Sci-Fi Channel reported that it was developing a Ringworld miniseries. The series never came to fruition.
  • In 2013, it was again announced by the SyFy Channel that a miniseries of the novel was in development. This proposed 4-hour miniseries is being written by Michael R. Perry and will be a co-production between MGM Television and Universal Cable Productions.
  • In 2017, Amazon announced that Ringworld was one of three science fiction series it was developing for its streaming service. MGM were again listed as a co-producer.

Here we are in 2018, Ringworld has yet to exist on screen. Why?… Could Ringworld influence a reality they’d rather keep us ignorant of? After all, the arch (parabola) has been depicted throughout known history as sacred.




Proposed Space Colonies 

In 1928, an Austro-Hungarian rocket pioneer (Herman Potocnik) published a book called ‘The problem with space travel‘. The book described a 100 foot (30 meter) ring-shaped space station that would rotate to generate “gravity“. Since then, every single model proposed for free space has been depicted as a ring or tube shaped object, with all life existing on the interior. And although these concepts rely heavily on the Coriolis Effect, the theory of gravity in general has ignored the most critical facts about the world & atmosphere in which we dwell; it’s called pressure, barometric to be precise. Not to mention how a sphere within a sphere creates electrical tension. Those that’ve done their research know that static electricity can and does allow water to curve. This is a fact that can be replicated and observed by anyone, but tends to go widely ignored by the flat earth movements. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again; Limiting the creation, limits the possibilities, therefor limiting the creator. Are we really prepared to create such limits to our reality?


Below is a compilation of science fiction space colony concepts, ringworlds, and other images for us to ponder. I encourage all to think for themselves, and question anything of popular opinion.

8a7615a45fc0d37640b5a0a68e349d9aAC75-1886Bernal_sphere_interiorBernalInteriordjbt3g6etvnbo1oh3tpve7cd40320660e53215764124873a192aIMG_7261IMG_7262IMG_7263IMG_7264IMG_7267IMG_7268IMG_7269IMG_7272 2Orbital Space Stationnasa space colony moonScreen Shot 2018-04-29 at 10.11.27 PM

7I5ZelQ8fc4e0105cd2ba4ead2ce3e39fb08712c2a287b9496308d2b661d81791270602halo_eclipsemountains spartan hills halo reach helmets_www.wallpaperhi.com_32th-25th-26th-29




Sun’rise’ & ‘set’- The Illusion that Defines the ‘Boundaries’ of our World (part 1)


What we experience to be “sunrise” and “sunset”, is in fact an optical illusion beyond our realm of sensory perception. The same applies with the moon and all other luminaries. And although modern science cannot dispute this, they’ve managed to substitute critical details with intangible, theoretic claims in an attempt to conceal our true, yet obscured reality. The Sun could be considered a radiant frequency in the form of energy, being cast through multiple dimensions of luminiferous atmosphere/aether within the flow of the electromagnetic field. Divergence & convergence of a dielectric field maintain a fluctuating grid across the reflective surface of earth. This dielectric field could be the reason for our blue skies. Just as the horizon is a sort of hallucination, so is the apparent ‘rising/setting’ sun. We all perceive our own individual Sun, but we experience its glory on a collective level. What we are not experiencing together, is being defined by the apparent ‘boundaries‘ of this very illusion, as we’re only capable of perceiving our world in small fragments… Bear with me, this will all make sense upon gaining your undivided attention; with the assumption that you’ve already brought an open mind. I am quite confident in its ability to resonate with the freest of minds, & its potential to enlighten those who seek a higher truth.

The limits of your mind define the boundaries of your world”   -Ritu Ghatourey

Universal symbolism within architecture encrypt the multidimensional Sun


Below; Rainbows could very well be revealing the dielectric field in conjunction to Earth’s surface. This is a topic difficult to conceptualize without going into detail. We will cover these detail’s in the near future, on a separate post.




So what’s occurring on a physical level before & after twilight? Is it possible to decipher illusion from reality, and reality from illusion? As humble as I’d like to approach this answer, i hold no reservation’s due to the overwhelming evidence I’ve acquired and am now prepared to present. Before we dig in, I must specify that I do not know what the Sun’s initial source is, nor how far it is. And no matter my doubt in its visibility to the human eye from earth, I can only suspect Venus. I will touch on a few more notion’s, but for now we will focus on the tangible evidence, and where it potentially leads in relation to our reality. The following list of topic’s are of vital importance to recognizing this very reality, & eventually delve into uncharted territory within the social “truth” communities.

  • Horizon
  • Surface Refraction
  • The Belt of Venus & The Shadow of Earth
  • Symbolism





  1. the line at which the earth’s surface and the sky appear to meet.
    “the sun rose above the horizon”
    synonyms:skyline · range of vision · field of view · vista · view
    • the circular boundary of the part of the earth’s surface visible from a particular point, ignoring irregularities and obstructions.
    • astronomy
      a great circle of the celestial sphere, the plane of which passes through the center of the earth and is parallel to that of the apparent horizon of a place.
  2. (horizons)
    the limit of a person’s mental perception, experience, or interest.
    “she wanted to leave home and broaden her horizons”
    synonyms: range of experience · outlook · perspective · scope

The late middle english definition of the word ‘horizon’ is spot on, emphasizing key terms (in bold) at an elementary level. When considering this definition alone, it’s perfectly safe to say that our ‘horizon’ is only; an appearance, our range of vision, field of view, visible boundary, mental perception, range of experience, perspective.. Other sources have defined the term as; an illusion, hallucination.. When observing the horizon, only an increase in altitude & angle would allow us to resolve this boundary of mental perception. To simplify with an example; the angular resolution of a crawling toddler is more limited than that of its standing mother, therefor both perceive slightly different horizons, hence sun’rise’ or ‘set’.

Screen Shot 2018-04-01 at 1.21.11 PM
The horizon, as defined, is an illusion, just as the perceived ‘rising’/’setting’ Sun

Screen Shot 2018-04-14 at 10.47.15 PM
What’s been depicted & perceived as “atmospheric layers” is, in reality, Earth. These obscured layers often reveal themselves on high altitude ballon footage.

It seemed a flat disc with upturned edge”       – Auguste Piccard 1931



Professor Piccard was well aware of his limited sensory perception from 10 miles above. Therefor, he knew he was only observing a small fraction of earth from this altitude when he witnessed this “upturned edge“.. I’ve come to wonder why he switched gears & went on to explore the vast oceans of earth after his experience. His son, Jacques Piccard, followed in his footsteps as an oceanographer & has also developed underwater vehicles for studying ocean currents. Why did their so-called space exploration come to a halt? It’s obvious their passion for truth was quite prominent. For Auguste to wrap up exploration of the sky/space, just to explore earth’s oceans, as well as influencing his son to do the same, doesn’t make much sense, right?.. Unless what’s above is literally, what’s below, and what’s below is literally, what’s above. Did the Piccard’s become aware of an inverted world in which humanity is cradled within the contours of a “cosmic egg“, just as the ancients believed? If this was the case, the closest way out of this world would be down.



Video- Observing Earths Hidden Horizons

Video- The Luminous Oasis & Shadow of Mother Earth

If you’re still skeptical about the direction I’m headed here; good.. In fact, I could only encourage this skepticism with such a brief & limited explanation of our perceived horizon. However, the list of subjects & topics are never-ending upon research of this very paradigm. I hope to cover as many as possible throughout the life of this website. But for now, we will continue with what’s observable and tangible.


Surface Refraction

This is a critical topic I recently published a video about on YouTube. It’s not as easy to present in an article, as observation of moving objects tend to reveal the effects of surface refraction much better than screenshots/photos. But I will do my best to explain, & also leave a link to the video in reference.


Modern science uses examples like we see above to explain upward refraction through a liquid medium (water). They also compare this effect to what we observe on the horizon. But they’ve left some significant details out that a child could notice, called geometric optics. When we observe the horizon, we are viewing out at a completely different angle than we would be when looking down into an aquarium or glass of water. We look out onto the horizon, and we look down into an aquarium. So in order to get an idea of the refraction effect the horizon displays, we must observe the aquarium or glass of water from a more suitable angle, the side. It becomes quite obvious that this refraction has the complete opposite effect than what we’ve been indoctrinated to believe.

Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 9.11.41 AM
Looking down into water does not create the same refraction effect as looking out onto the horizon. The angle we observe effects the angle of refraction.

Here are a few more examples of surface refraction that clearly display a downward effect, rather than an “upward” effect. A link to the video will follow

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 10.55.16 PM
Clouds on the near horizon prominently display downward refraction

Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 8.23.01 AM
Looking through a glass of water from the side shows a significant amount of downward refraction

Screen Shot 2017-11-19 at 1.49.20 PM copy
A flashlight behind a mirror laying flat below it, displays the same downward refraction. Oceans and mirages are highly reflective, just as the mirror used in this example

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 11.24.44 PM
Downward refraction is quite apparent within inverted, surface reflections (mirages)

Video- Debunking the ‘Upward’ Refraction Farce

Video- 0.5 miles No Earth Convexity, Upward Surface Refraction Destroyed


The Belt of Venus & The Shadow of Earth

Screen Shot 2018-02-10 at 12.25.26 PM
“We do not experience reality in the so-called ‘real world’, but only its dim shadow”   -Plato

I firmly suspect that what I displayed above is the very “dim shadow” Plato was referring to in his quote concerning ‘reality in the so-called real world‘. As the modern day outlook on Platos described “form” is not only minimized to allegoric meaning, but is carried into a technical metaphor in which strictly pertains to an “idea” only.  It’s no wonder many find his literature hard to comprehend, as the translations are designed to obscure the physical realities within. For those who’ve read my previous article titled/linked, “What did the Ancients really thing about the shape of Earth”, they should have an idea of what Plato & Socrates really thought about the earth/realm in which we exist. I’ve personally come to think that philosophy was intentionally banished from science by design, as this very philosophy is an academic discipline that relies heavily on knowledge, logic & understanding of nature and reality in general. Therefor, it’s a real academic form of science that can be especially maintained by the Socratic Method, also known as Maieutics. It was Socrates that was said be the first, in known history, to coin the phrase “question everything“. It was also depicted that the Athenians sentenced him to death for ‘heresy, treason and corruption of the youth‘. I found it rather interesting after learning that all who spoke of this very paradigm (interior earth) were either murdered, or died under suspicion/unknown circumstances. Either way, let’s get back to the point of this section.

Screen Shot 2018-04-17 at 6.30.43 AM
The grid on the bottom set shows the hidden horizons that hide behind our range of perception

Using the term ‘hidden horizons’ in a literal sense, tends to be the most simplistic way of explaining this. There’s our visual horizon, and then there’s what I call, the ‘solar horizon‘. The visual horizon being; the line at which we perceive ‘sky and earth convergence’. And the solar horizon being; the top of the ‘shadow well above our visual horizon. To elaborate further, we must recognize our range of perception & its limits. Below are comparisons of 2 photos of Dubai, both taken in the same direction, at different altitudes.

Screen Shot 2018-04-01 at 1.21.11 PM
The line displays our line of perception from the image at a lower altitude

Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 1.40.39 PM
Just as the horizon, our apparent sun’rise’ & sun’set’ is an illusion, determined by our field of view

Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 1.35.36 PM
The only ‘boundaries’ we have of our world are in our mind



This is the section that requires an article of its own. I’ve went into a few details in my most recent video, ‘The Illusion that defines the “Boundaries” or our world; & the potential symbolism’. Part 2 will go much more into depth…








What did the Ancients really think about the shape of Earth? updated

Screen Shot 2017-11-11 at 6.34.56 PM

I remember being taught a vast amount of information in my history class when I was in middle school, but I’ve come to question every bit of it over the past decade. It was in fact my history teacher that told me; “the ancients believed the world to be flat”, & I believed her. Then in 2013 I became aware of the globe deception, & eventually Eric Dubay, amongst others, convinced me that earth was really “flat” in many ways. He also repeated exactly what my history teacher told me; “the ancients believed the earth to be flat”. Who in their free mind would believe that we’re really on a random “ball, hurling through vast chaos” anyway? It took me another four years of research, observation & reflection to recognize that I was still being deceived on many levels, especially with the overwhelming flat earth influence on all social media sites & beyond. Now it’s the year 2018, & FE (flat earth) has practically gone mainstream. FE propaganda is everywhere, even on billboards. And millions have flocked on board to demand that “earth is in fact, flat”. The number of believers are growing faster than any psy-op in our known history, & I won’t be surprised when a billion people become true believers in the flat earth paradigm. While some have put the effort & time into research and observation of their world, many more others have never went beyond YouTube and Facebook in their FE journey. For those that ‘haven’t’, their predetermined beliefs have caused them to ignore anything that doesn’t fit their preferred paradigm, and I’m just as guilty as anyone. We are all vulnerable to being deceived and always will be until we choose to wash our programming down the river’s of belief. And even then, we must remain humble & conscious of our limits to know the actual truth. Beliefs hinder knowledge, and we are minuscule compared to the monstrous world we can only experience in tiny fragments.

So what did the ancients really believe about the shape of earth? Where is all the evidence to their so-called “beliefs in a flat earth”? Should we trust the “official story”? Let’s go back & take a look at what’s been depicted by these alleged ancient civilizations that’ve influenced so many secret societies, royal families & their occult practices. Or was it the other way around; did the secret societies & royal families influence the depictions of history, civilization & occult practices? I tend to suspect it goes both ways, yet still very significant to give attention to. As anything, we must take each patch of information with a grain of salt & compare everything as a whole. For those that’ve delved deep enough, you should be aware that there’s nothing new under the sun, & the true history of humanity and earth are far richer & more advanced than we’ve been indoctrinated to believe…

The Egyptian Universe depicts a ‘hole‘, or ‘cave‘ as their reality. The term ‘deep‘ is used numerous times in the Bible when relating to the creation and the universe. 

The Moon card of Crowley’s Thoth tarot card deck.


Ancient Egypt & The Emerald Tablets of Hermes


Translations From- Jabir ibn Hayyan

1) “Balinas mentions the engraving on the table in the hand of Hermes, which says: 1) Truth! Certainty! That in which there is no doubt!”
2) “That which is above is from that which is below, and that which is below is from that which is above, working the miracles of one“.
3) “As all things were from one”.                                                                                                    4) “Its father is the Sun and its mother the Moon”.
5) “The Earth carried it in her belly, and the Wind nourished it in her belly, 7) as Earth which shall become Fire.”
7) “Feed the Earth from that which is subtle, with the greatest power”.
8) “It ascends from the earth to the heaven and becomes ruler over that which is above and that which is below.”


Should we limit depictions as such to allegoric & metaphoric meaning? This is exactly how the majority of researchers take these translations, for most cannot fathom the hidden possibilities to the extent of reality. I’ve heard everything from “The Mandela Effect” to “Flat Earth” in reference to the images below. Should we be thinking “one dimensional” when it comes to our physical reality? Have we proven the Mandela Effect with 100% certainty? “No” would be my answer to both questions, but I could only encourage readers to think about it themselves… Looking at the Emerald Tablet translations; number two’s emphasis on “as above so below” clearly depicts no separation between the two (above/below), & even states “working the miracle of one”. If on a physical level, the phrase would correspond to everything that surrounds us, or above us is exactly the same as below us. Not just a few things, but everything. Number 3 states that “all things were from one“. Once again, there’s no separation depicted. Number 4, “Its father is the Sun and its mother the Moon”. and 5, The earth carried it in her belly”. Should I say anything further, or let the reader ponder on these two phrases while analyzing the images below? Surely it will resonate with someone.



Egyptian Flat Earth?


Nut, covered in stars is considered the “Sky Goddess“. Geb, her alleged brother & husband lay below spread out, is considered the “Earth God“. The flat earth movement’s have used this very illustration as so-called “evidence” that Egyptian’s believed the earth to be “flat” with a “dome” above, with the ‘dome’ being “Nut“. Yet they fail to mention “Geb, God of the Earth“. They also give no attention to the two deities standing above, beyond the sky, on each side. Until FE & globe researchers recognize the significant possibilities of the sky literally hiding earth and water curving within, they will remain closed to its plausabilities. The phrase “hidden horizons” does not have to be limited to a metaphor, it is very likely a reality as I will clearly show in a following blog. Nut, the sky goddess has been displayed in other positions with her “feathers of truth” spread out in the shape of an arch.



Ancient Sumerians & Babylonians


The following is an excerpt from a book called: “The Sumerians- their history, culture and character, published in 1963, chapter 4- Religion: theology, rite and myth:

“In the eyes of Sumerian teachers & sages, the major components of the universe were heaven & earth; indeed, their term for the universe was ‘an-ki’, a compound meaning “heaven-earth”. The earth was a flat disc surmounted by a vast hollow space, completely inclosed by a solid surface in the shape of a vault. Surrounding the heaven-earth on all sides, as well as top & bottom, was the boundless sea in which the universe somehow remained fixed & immovable.”

So the above excerpt clearly depicts the Sumerians believed earth was “flat“, right? Wrong; Only the translations & author have depicted such limitations to their paradigm. There’s much more information to analyze in this brief paragraph that strongly suggest a different story. If we think about the words & phrases in bold letters, a more elaborate, but less fathomable picture comes to mind for the free-minded thinkers.


Aztec Cosmology and Ritual550px-Xiuhtecuhtli_1

“The Aztec world consisted of three main parts: the earth world on which humans lived, an underworld which belonged to the dead, and the upper plane in the sky. The earth and the underworld were both open for humans to enter, whereas the upper plane in the sky was impenetrable to humans. Existence was envisioned as straddling the two worlds in a cycle of birth, life, death and rebirth. Thus as the sun was believed to dwell in the underworld at night to rise reborn in the morning and maize kernels were interred to later sprout anew, so the human and divine existence was also envisioned as being cyclical. The upper and nether worlds were both thought to be layered. Mictlan had nine layers which were inhabited by different deities and mythical beings. The sky had thirteen layers, the highest of which was called Omeyocan and served as the residence of the progenitor dual god Ometeotl. The lowest layer of the sky was a verdant spring-like place with abundant water called Tlalocan. In Aztec cosmology, as in Mesoamerica in general, geographical features such as caves and mountains held symbolic value as places of crossing between the upper and nether worlds. The cardinal directions were symbolically connected to the religious layout of the world as well; each direction was associated with specific colors and Gods.”   –Wikipedia


First off, we can see that the Sumarians associated heaven & earth as one living, breathing system. The Aztec’s depicted earth and the underworld as open to humans, but the “upper plane in the sky was impenetrable to humans”. Geographical features such as caves & mountains also held symbolic value to the Aztec’s. The Sumerian texts seem to be switched around within the translation. It appears to be telling us that earth is in motion, & that’s a contradiction to what many believe to be a “flat earth”. From ancient Aztecs, Babylonians to modern science, there are countless sources that’ve depicted the “universe to be flat & earth to be curved”. For those that’ve been studying cosmologies & cosmogonies, the depictions of a “flat astral-plane” or “astral-worlds” have been emphasized to a high level of significance. This very disc is said to be “Surmounted by a vast hollow space, completely inclosed by a solid surface in the shape of a vault.”

Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 11.00.10 AM
Observable evidence of a flat astral-plane

And this is exactly where a switch seems to be created within academic’s in order to confuse humanity about the ancient’s astronomical & world view’s. The last sentence of the Sumerian excerpt may give us a big clue; “Surrounding the ‘heaven-earth’ on all sides, as well as top & bottom, was the boundless sea in which the universe somehow remained fixed & immovable.” While again, the Aztecs explain thisupper plane as impenetrable to humans“. Can you recognize what they’ve likely mixed up in translation? With contradictory “heavens” depicted as being “flat”, what would be the “surrounding, ‘boundless sea’ on all sides, as well as top and bottom, that remained fixed and immovable“? Most free-minded reserchers would agree that earth is most likely ‘fixed and immovable’. I personally think the depictions of an inner, concave earth have been obscured & minimized to a limited paradigm, such as FE. The story doesn’t match up & that should be an eye-opener to all who think for themselves, instead of following popular opinion.



Let’s give close attention to the Babylonian/alchemic & Aztec illustrations of the “cosmic egg“, universe models above. I flipped one to give us a different perspective… These are models used as so-called “evidence that the ancients believed earth to be flat“. But what features are being overlooked within these ‘cosmic eggs‘? First off, there are deer, snakes, insects & other life in the canopy of what we call “the tree of life“. Yes, that’s life being illustrated within the arch of what FE considers the “dome“. Yet no animals/life on the disc in the middle of this ‘egg‘. We also see light being carried on a rainbow below the disc in which FE considers to be “the underworld“. But just as the Sumerians depicted, this very disc is “surmounted by a vast hollow space, completely inclosed by a solid surface in the shape of a vault”, while also being “surrounded on all sides, as well as top & bottom, by a boundless sea that remained fixed & immovable“. This ‘surmounted, surrounding, fixed & immovable, solid surface with a boundless sea’ sounds exactly like the realm in which life would dwell, just as the deer show in the illustration. And once again, the Aztecs depicted the “central plane to be impenetrable by humans”. The Emerald Tablets of Hermes depicted ‘what is above, is below’, & visa versa. Lastly, what’s been suspected as a magnetic “mountain” (Mount Meru) in the geographic center of a ‘flat earth‘ AE model has never been found or photographed, yet closely resembles what’s suspected to be in the center of a concave earth. This has been encrypted in the entertainment industry as “Lucy in the sky with diamonds” & “shine on crazy diamond”. It’s also a hidden reference to “Lucifer & the Illuminated one“, which we will get into more detail about later. I’ve also compared what’s said to be the radiant density of CMOR meteor orbits, to solar atmospheric refraction/dispersion (sun-dogs/hallows), & the similarities are somewhat striking to say the least.



Ancient Greek Pholosophy

Illustration of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave

Socrates and Plato had world view’s that many are still unaware of today, as they both believed we lived inside a ‘concave earth‘ or a “geode“. Socrates was said to be put to death, just as every other influential person that tried to reveal this very ‘interior‘ paradigm to the world. Plato was much more cautious & approached most of his work on an allegoric or metaphoric level. But the “form” he spoke of ties into the suspected reality of our inner world with perfection. Only an oblivious society would minimize his work to a simple “idea“, while ignoring the physical plausibilities… The following are excerpts of Plato’s literature that strongly display their beliefs of the ‘world around us‘.


“What do you mean, Socrates? said Simmias. I have myself heard many descriptions of the earth, but I do not know in what you are putting your faith, and I should like to know. Well, Simmias, replied Socrates, the recital of a tale does not, I think, require the art of Glaucus; and I know not that the art of Glaucus could prove the truth of my tale, which I myself should never be able to prove, and even if I could, I fear, Simmias, that my life would come to an end before the argument was completed. I may describe to you, however, the form and regions of the earth according to my conception of them.  
  That, said Simmias, will be enough. Well, then, he said, my conviction is that the earth is a round body in the center of the heavens, and therefore has no need of air or any similar force as a support, but is kept there and hindered from falling or inclining any way by the equability of the surrounding heaven and by her own equipoise. For that which, being in equipoise, is in the center of that which is equably diffused, will not incline any way in any degree, but will always remain in the same state and not deviate. And this is my first notion. Which is surely a correct one, said Simmias. Also I believe that the earth is very vast, and that we who dwell in the region extending from the river Phasis to the Pillars of Heracles, along the borders of the sea, are just like ants or frogs about a marsh, and inhabit a small portion only, and that many others dwell in many like places. For I should say that in all parts of the earth there are hollows of various forms and sizes, into which the water and the mist and the air collect; and that the true earth is pure and in the pure heaven, in which also are the stars—that is the heaven which is commonly spoken of as the ether, of which this is but the sediment collecting in the hollows of the earth. But we who live in these hollows are deceived into the notion that we are dwelling above on the surface of the earth; which is just as if a creature who was at the bottom of the sea were to fancy that he was on the surface of the water, and that the sea was the heaven through which he saw the sun and the other stars—he having never come to the surface by reason of his feebleness and sluggishness, and having never lifted up his head and seen, nor ever heard from one who had seen, this region which is so much purer and fairer than his own. Now this is exactly our case: for we are dwelling in a hollow of the earth, and fancy that we are on the surface; and the air we call the heaven, and in this we imagine that the stars move. But this is also owing to our feebleness and sluggishness, which prevent our reaching the surface of the air: for if any man could arrive at the exterior limit, or take the wings of a bird and fly upward, like a fish who puts his head out and sees this world, he would see a world beyond; and, if the nature of man could sustain the sight, he would acknowledge that this was the place of the true heaven and the true light and the true stars. For this earth, and the stones, and the entire region which surrounds us are spoilt and corroded, like the things in the sea which are corroded by the brine; for in the sea too there is hardly any noble or perfect growth, but clefts only, and sand, and an endless slough of mud: and even the shore is not to be compared to the fairer sights of this world. And greater far is the superiority of the other. Now of that upper earth which is under the heaven, I can tell you a charming tale, Simmias, which is well worth hearing.”             -Excerpt from ‘The Apology, Phaedo and Crito of Socrates’ by Plato

The above excerpt was self explanatory, & the world view of Socrates was apparently on the ‘interior of earth‘. Should we question what Plato depicted of Socrates & it’s translations? Of coarse, everything must be taken with skepticism, but when the dots keep connecting, we must follow. And this specific paradigm has a never-ending trail that I’ve personally never experienced with any other alternative. No matter how much I attempt to prove a ‘concave/hollow earth‘ wrong, I not only fail, but end up finding more & more to support the notion. It was never a preferred world view of mine on a personal level, it seemed to find me more than I found it.

Allegory of the Cave


“Plato has Socrates describe a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all of their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall from objects passing in front of a fire behind them, and give names to these shadows. The shadows are the prisoners’ reality. Socrates explains how the philosopher is like a prisoner who is freed from the cave and comes to understand that the shadows on the wall are not reality at all, for he can perceive the true form of reality rather than the manufactured reality that is the shadows seen by the prisoners. The inmates of this place do not even desire to leave their prison; for they know no better life. The prisoners manage to break their bonds one day, and discover that their reality was not what they thought it was. They discovered the sun, which Plato uses as an analogy for the fire that man cannot see behind. Like the fire that cast light on the walls of the cave, the human condition is forever bound to the impressions that are received through the senses. Even if these interpretations (or, in Kantian terminology, intuitions) are an absurd misrepresentation of reality, we cannot somehow break free from the bonds of our human condition – we cannot free ourselves from phenomenal state just as the prisoners could not free themselves from their chains. If, however, we were to miraculously escape our bondage, we would find a world that we could not understand – the sun is incomprehensible for someone who has never seen it. In other words, we would encounter another “realm”, a place incomprehensible because, theoretically, it is the source of a higher reality than the one we have always known; it is the realm of pure Form, pure fact.
Socrates remarks that this allegory can be paired with previous writings, namely the analogy of the sun and the analogy of the divided line.”

Imprisonment in the cave
“Plato begins by having Socrates ask Glaucon to imagine a cave where people have been imprisoned from birth. These prisoners are chained so that their legs and necks are fixed, forcing them to gaze at the wall in front of them and not look around at the cave, each other, or themselves. Behind the prisoners is a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway with a low wall, behind which people walk carrying objects or puppets “of men and other living things”. The people walk behind the wall so their bodies do not cast shadows for the prisoners to see, but the objects they carry do (“just as puppet showmen have screens in front of them at which they work their puppets”. The prisoners cannot see any of what is happening behind them, they are only able to see the shadows cast upon the cave wall in front of them. The sounds of the people talking echo off the walls, and the prisoners believe these sounds come from the shadows.
Socrates suggests that the shadows are reality for the prisoners because they have never seen anything else; they do not realize that what they see are shadows of objects in front of a fire, much less that these objects are inspired by real things outside the cave.” 

Departure from the cave
“Plato then supposes that one prisoner is freed. This prisoner would look around and see the fire. The light would hurt his eyes and make it difficult for him to see the objects casting the shadows. If he were told that what he is seeing is real instead of the other version of reality he sees on the wall, he would not believe it. In his pain, Plato continues, the freed prisoner would turn away and run back to what he is accustomed to (that is, the shadows of the carried objects). He writes “… it would hurt his eyes, and he would escape by turning away to the things which he was able to look at, and these he would believe to be clearer than what was being shown to him.”
Plato continues: “Suppose… that someone should drag him… by force, up the rough ascent, the steep way up, and never stop until he could drag him out into the light of the sun.”The prisoner would be angry and in pain, and this would only worsen when the radiant light of the sun overwhelms his eyes and blinds him.
“Slowly, his eyes adjust to the light of the sun. First he can only see shadows. Gradually he can see the reflections of people and things in water and then later see the people and things themselves. Eventually, he is able to look at the stars and moon at night until finally he can look upon the sun itself. Only after he can look straight at the sun “is he able to reason about it” and what it is.”

Return to the cave
“Plato continues, saying that the freed prisoner would think that the world outside the cave was superior to the world he experienced in the cave; “he would bless himself for the change, and pity [the other prisoners]” and would want to bring his fellow cave dwellers out of the cave and into the sunlight.
The returning prisoner, whose eyes have become accustomed to the sunlight, would be blind when he re-enters the cave, just as he was when he was first exposed to the sun. The prisoners, according to Plato, would infer from the returning man’s blindness that the journey out of the cave had harmed him and that they should not undertake a similar journey. Socrates concludes that the prisoners, if they were able, would therefore reach out and kill anyone who attempted to drag them out of the cave”